Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bump gtest #128

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2025
Merged

bump gtest #128

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2025

Conversation

camio
Copy link
Member

@camio camio commented Feb 27, 2025

Bump release to 1.16.0 and use GTest as the package name.

This should fix the issues found in #92

Copy link
Member

@wusatosi wusatosi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, out of curiosity, is there a reason that we do not use v1.16.0 as tag name?

Edit I learned something new today, source:

Where contents are being fetched from a remote location and you do not control that server, it is advisable to use a hash for GIT_TAG rather than a branch or tag name. A commit hash is more secure and helps to confirm that the downloaded contents are what you expected.

@camio camio merged commit f144574 into bemanproject:main Feb 28, 2025
66 checks passed
@camio camio deleted the bump-gtest branch February 28, 2025 00:41
@camio camio mentioned this pull request Feb 28, 2025
Copy link
Member

@neatudarius neatudarius left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants